06RESEARCH PAPERPreprint
Coverage Audits for LLM Interpretability Claims
發表日期
摘要
ABSTRACTZenodo 原文A Mercury methods note arguing that sparse probing, activation patching, subspace intervention, and pruning claims should report a coverage audit before making broad localization claims. The audit uses 19 fullgrid manifests and shows a 1/7 pass rate for older sparse or coarse protocols versus 12/12 for per-channel quantile dense runs.
全文 PDF
FULL TEXT1 個檔- 下載 PDFpaper.pdf・48 KB・本站
PDF 與 Zenodo 上的檔案相同(大小與 md5 已核對)。
論文資料
DETAILSZenodo 紀錄 20729124- 作者
- Chen, Ho Yiing
- 發表日期
- 資源類型
- Preprint
- DOI
- 10.5281/zenodo.20729124
- Zenodo
- zenodo.org/records/20729124
- 授權
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
作者 Chen, Ho Yiing 是織田紀香的本名(陳禾穎)英文拼寫。標題、摘要、關鍵字與授權照 Zenodo 原文。
關鍵字
KEYWORDS20 個- Mercury
- coverage audits
- LLM interpretability
- mechanistic interpretability
- activation coverage
- sparse probing
- fullgrid
- coverage failure
- activation patching
- model pruning
- measurement validity
- interpretability claims
- cell coverage
- dense activation measurement
- sampling bias
- neural atlas
- model evaluation
- result governance
- transformer internals
- reproducibility